Thursday March 23, 2017

Register today

REGIONAL JOURNALISM, GLOBAL PERSPECTIVE.

Opinion
MMIW

Overlooking a regional crux of vulnerability

Arctic co-operation and policy-making must take into account both the male and female halves of the region’s population

Share this article

Facebook Google Twitter Mail

iAbout Press releases

As part of our continuing efforts to bring you as much information about our region as possible we offer readers a press release service that allows private firms, public agencies, non-governmental organisations and other groups to submit relevant press releases on our website.

All press releases in this section are published in their full length and have not been edited.

If you have a press release or other announcement you would like to have published, please send it to arcticjournal-editor@arcticjournal.com.

We reserve the right to reject press releases we deem irrelevant or inappropriate. 

All material submitted to The Arctic Journal, including pictures and videos, will be assumed to be available for publication by The Arctic Journal and its related entities.

Arctic Council 20 Years
As the Arctic Council celebrates its 20th anniversary this year, we are taking a closer look at the organisation, its work and the people involved with it.

In our latest initiative, we are again this year partnering with the Arctic Yearbook, which devoted this year’s edition to the Arctic Council. We will be republishing yearbook commentary and opinion on a regular basis.

A selection of our recent articles related to the Arctic Council include:
Compelling co-operation
Designing a better Arctic
Arctic Council upgrade

Moving forward
A wish for observers that work
Norway’s new Arctic ambassador
Maine meeting brings Arctic business out of area
Mr Consistency
US to end chairmanship on science note
North Atlantic group knocking on Arctic’s door
“The majority of people in the North aren’t represented on the Arctic Council”

The article below was originally published in the 2016 Arctic Yearbook, which was released on October 27.

Changes to the Arctic’s physical environment – driven by climate change, technological innovation, demographic shifts and the increased presence of extractive industries – are significantly impacting the region’s social environment. In conjunction, as extractive industries and their associated challenges permeate remote and rural communities in the circumpolar North, the role of women in community adaptation and in shaping change is weakened.

Across the Arctic, pressure points arise at a faster rate than regional policies are drafted, and women living in this region often fall between the cracks of a stretched and weakened social safety net. It is this crux of vulnerability in which women get caught.

The Arctic Council recognised the importance of women in developing Arctic communities in its 2002 Inari Declaration by encouraging “the integration of gender equality and women ... perspectives in all efforts to enhance human living conditions in the Arctic”. A conference that same year, titled ‘Taking Wing: Gender Equality and Women in the Arctic’ , included a focus on economic policy, health, women’s rights, violence against women and the trafficking of women.

SEE RELATED: Editor’s Briefing | Violence against Canadian aboriginal women

Twelve years later, in her statement at the conference ‘Gender Equality in the Arctic: Current Realities, Future Challenges’, former Finnish president Tarja Halonen further highlighted that climate change can hinder the productivity and use of land, which can adversely impact women’s land ownership, inheritance, control and management over natural resources. Conversations relating to “climate change, gender equality, ownership and control rights, and environmental protection”, she argued, “must be closely interlinked”.

Yet integrating a gender dimension into domestic and foreign policy on climate change can be contentious. When Canada’s environment and climate change minister, Catherine McKenna, drew attention to the gendered dimension of climate change at a 2016 G7 meeting of environment ministers, she witnessed a backlash.

The minister’s comments flagged women’s social and economic vulnerability in both natural resource discussions and climate disasters, and yielded a “swift, and angry” response. In turn, Ms McKenna’s comments noted that the support of women’s rights by the Canadian government must be part and parcel of its federal policies, highlighting that the (gendered) dimension is often lost in climate talks.

Pulling out of the Canadian context, a 2013 Arctic Centre report commissioned by the Finnish Foreign Ministry sought to understand how international processes and standards, such as ‘free, prior and informed consent’ (FPIC), interact with self-determination and the rights of indigenous women in the context of climate change. In line with Ms Halonen’s and Ms McKenna’s statements, the report found that indigenous women globally, including the Arctic, continue to face systemic violations at the intersection of gender, indigeneity and climate change.

SEE RELATED: Seeking a light in the Arctic

As an example of how these dimensions intersect, and the delayed government response, we need not look further than the 2013 Family Homes on Reserves and Matrimonial Interests or Rights Act in Canada. Until 2013, matrimonial real property (MRP) for Canadian aboriginal women living on-reserve fell into what Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development Canada heralded as a “long-standing and unacceptable legislative gap”, as neither the Indian Act, nor provincial or territorial law, provided redress. 

This new legislation is an example of how law can be used by Canadian aboriginal women to uphold their property rights, which ripples into their ability to participate in natural resource development and climate change discussions.

Yet, when looking at the intersection of gender, climate change and extractive industries, we should not only approach the geography of the Arctic as fixed. And few subjects so strikingly pull into light this transcendence of borders as does the flux of women moving across Arctic borders for the purpose of sex, particularly to remote resource extraction sites. It may not always grab the attention of the United Nations Office on Drug and Crime or other leading agencies and authorities, but it should.

Research by Victoria Sweet highlights how an increasing interest in resource extraction, as a result of climate change, and its associated demographic shifts might heighten the risk of trafficking in the region. To mitigate such risks, she argues that, communities must “remember the historical stories, officials need to understand the risk factors that come with extractive developments in rural areas, and preparations must be made for the next wave of outsiders entering the region” to protect indigenous and non-indigenous women.

SEE RELATED: Reducing the pain

This begs the question probed in many other spheres: could these issues be resolved if women were more involved in Arctic policy-shaping and decision-making? Studies focusing on Canada show that women only comprise 16% of northern management boards in its three northern territories. With such a small percentage, women are often subjected to marginalisation and rendered invisible in decision-making processes.

In Alaska, some view the impact of low oil prices on its economy as an opportunity to tackle the gender wage gap, which is significantly higher relative to the rest of the US. Employment is declining in traditionally male-dominated fields, like the extractive industries, while labour market data shows a growth in female-dominated industries, including healthcare and tourism.

As recommended by the Alaska Department of Labor and Workforce Development, a focus on expanding training opportunities and increasing wages for these industries will make the state a better place for women to work and live, all while injecting more money into the local economy.

But is it possible to tie all of this together? Nina Larsson and her work is a great example of the interplay between local narratives, domestic law-making and international standards, and how although domestic efforts have started to scratch the surface of such issues and intersections, much is left to be done on a regional scale to foster transnational responses.

SEE RELATED: Editor’s Briefing | Resolving conflicts

In November 2014, she spearheaded the first ever Indigenous Circumpolar Women’s Gathering in Yellowknife, where over 80 indigenous women shared their knowledge and approaches to programs and/or ongoing projects in different corners of the Arctic.

In a report on the subject titled ‘Mind the Gender Gap’, Ms Larsson further examined how Arctic states approach the inclusion of indigenous women in decision-making roles. Ms Larsson concluded that “Scandinavia’s approach to gender equality translate[s] into the appreciation of different management styles and a gender diverse workforce,” something the Northwest Territories could learn from.

Even though some Arctic states are often heralded as utopia for gender equality, all Arctic states, and policy arenas like the Arctic Council, must ensure that gender is included across Arctic policy and law. But where to begin with already marginalised issues in a remote area? How can we connect the Nina Larssons, who strive to connect local narratives with transnational research and policy to ignite domestic change?

Join us in helping connect these narratives, won’t you, so we can ensure that the next 20 years of Arctic co-operation and policy-making take into better account half of the Arctic’s population?

Rachel Kohut is a BCL/LLB candidate at McGill University. Previously, she completed her master’s of public health at Memorial University of Newfoundland.

Tahnee Prior is a 2015 Trudeau Scholar, Vanier Canada Graduate Scholar, and PhD candidate at the Balsillie School of International Affairs, University of Waterloo.

Together, they jumpstarted Plan Aa conversation turned digital platform that seeks to weave together stories to better inform gender-oriented policy-making across the Arctic. Today, Ms Prior leads the project. Both are members of the Tromsø-Umeå-Arkhangelsk-Rovaniemi-Kingston (TUARK) Network on Gender in the Arctic.