As part of our continuing efforts to bring you as much information about our region as possible we offer readers a press release service that allows private firms, public agencies, non-governmental organisations and other groups to submit relevant press releases on our website.
All press releases in this section are published in their full length and have not been edited.
We reserve the right to reject press releases we deem irrelevant or inappropriate.
All material submitted to The Arctic Journal, including pictures and videos, will be assumed to be available for publication by The Arctic Journal and its related entities.
Editor’s Briefing is a regular summary of the main points about a current topic. At the end of each summary we provide a list of external articles and resources to give readers a place to begin if they would like to learn more.
Other internet bits and bobs, including Tweets and videos, are occasionally included.
As a way to encourage discussion about the topic, the briefing will also seek to include opinionated commentary. If you would like to suggest a topic for a briefing, or if you would like to provide a comment about a topic, please contact us.
Arctic Council media briefing March 10, Juneau, Alaska SAO Chair Ambassador David Balton
Some squaring away remains to be done before the Finns are handed responsibility on May 11, in Fairbanks, Alaska, according David Balton, the US ambassador currently leading the senior Arctic officials, the diplomats who represent council member states. But, during theirtwo-day meeting in Juneau last week, the group “reviewed, considered and approved” enough work to be close to being able to close the books on the US programme, Mr Balton told reporters last week.
The items SAOs finalise will be taken up for approval during the council’s ministerial meeting, the highpoint of the Arctic Council’s two-year cycle.
Among the most awaited of these are an assessment of the region’s telecommunications needs. An agrement on scientific co-operation is also getting much attention and may be the marquee accomplishment of the US chairmanship.
Other notable outcomes that can be expected in May: a searchable database of equipment available for response to emergencies and a pair of reports looking into marine biodiversity and how well countries in the region are living up to targets for nature protection.
Heavy fuel oils and black carbon, both major pollution concerns, particularly as shippers take an interest in sailing Arctic routes, were also a topic of discussion in Juneau, but the issue is one that is better addressed together with International Maritime Organisation, rather than by Arctic states alone, given the international nature of the industry.
Less certain (and thus of more interest) is what America’s Arctic policies are headed. Momentum appears to be carring the chairmanship into Fairbanks. One signal of how much attention the White House will pay to the region after the ministerial will be whether Rex Tillerson, the secretary of state, and the nominal chair of the council, will attend.
Typically, member states are represented by their foreign ministers at the biennial meetings, but there are notable exceptions. In 2015, for example, Moscow sent its environment minister. Canada, the host of the same meeting, was represented by Leona Aglukkaq, an Inuk serving as environment minister at the time (and who also held an ‘Arctic Council’ portfolio).
Whether Mr Tillerson will go remains uncertain. He has been encouraged to do so, and not showing up would break form (Mr Tillerson’s predecessors have attended the previous three ministerial meetings). Worse, it would be a let-down for the inhabitants of America’s Arctic.
“The government and people of Alaska would like him to be here,” Mr Balton said. But, he admitted, “secretaries of state are busy people”.
In addition to the American accomplishments for this session, the council has also been considering a number of larger issues, including whether to admit more observers. A decision about whether to grant additional states, NGOs or the like the right to sit in on meetings was put off during the 2015 ministerial, in order to give members time to consider what the role of observers should be.
This is a task the council has been working on under the US chairmanship. But, since the previous ministerial meeting, the queue of those waiting to get in has grown to 20, and Mr Balton is coy about their chances of getting in. “We may decide to admit one or more of the 20,” he says.
Another topic that will carry over to the Finnish chairmanship is how to fund participation of the indigenous groups that participate in the council: such groups have small budgets and small staffs, and attending meetings of an increasingly active council requires money as well as time.
Giving the council a long-term outlook is another on-going project likely to be finalised during the Finnish chairmanship. The goal is to provide the council with a sense of continuity,rather than setting new priorities for itself at the start of each chairmanship round. One of the leading options for accomplishing this is to set a multi-year work progamme. Such a period could last as long as 10 years.
This appears to be an idea the Finns have embraced, at least in part. To be sure, two of the themes their chairmanship will pursue are new (education and meteorology). Geting the Arctic Council to work closer together with the Arctic Economic Council has also been mentioned as a goal, but it is not listed as one of the four main themes.
However, two others (telecoms connectivity and environmental protection) are similar to some of the Americans’ goals. This will be a good start for those hoping to make sure that the more things change the more they stay the same.