Thursday May 25, 2017

Register today


Week Ahead

Not all bad

Russia and the US meet to talk about their disagreements. The Arctic isn’t on their list
No hard feelings (Photo: Russian MFA)

Share this article

Facebook Google Twitter Mail

iAbout Press releases

As part of our continuing efforts to bring you as much information about our region as possible we offer readers a press release service that allows private firms, public agencies, non-governmental organisations and other groups to submit relevant press releases on our website.

All press releases in this section are published in their full length and have not been edited.

If you have a press release or other announcement you would like to have published, please send it to

We reserve the right to reject press releases we deem irrelevant or inappropriate. 

All material submitted to The Arctic Journal, including pictures and videos, will be assumed to be available for publication by The Arctic Journal and its related entities.

Each week, The Arctic Journal gets our readers ready for the week ahead by profiling some of the events we expect to be reading about in the coming days. If you have an event you think ought to be profiled in a coming week, please contact us.

Even before this week’s events in Syria, it was unlikely the Arctic was going to appear in any significant way on the agenda of the April 12 meeting between Rex Tillerson (above right), the American secretary of state, and Sergey Lavrov (at left), the Russian foreign minister.

In addition to the six-year civil war that has seen the two countries backing different sides, Washington and Moscow, according to experts, have a laundry list of volatile issues to discuss, including Yemen, Libya, Ukraine, Afghanistan, North Korea and the Middle East.

Although America does not blame Russia for what is suspected to be a Syrian chemical-weapons attack against civilians (Washington, in fact, is said to have alerted Moscow that it was launching cruise missiles at a Syrian air base in retaliation) it does feel the Kremlin’s support for Bashar el-Assad, Syria’s president, made the attack possible. 

SEE RELATED: Trump’s Arctic card?

Such sentiment will do little to change Moscow’s opinion that relations with Washington are “at zero”, a description both Mr Lavrov and his boss, Vladimir Putin, have used. Mr Putin, however, indicated during last week’s Territory of Dialogue, an international conference about the region, that it was not the situation he preferred.

With no Arctic issues likely to come up, the exercise for those with an interest in the Arctic, then, will be to divine whether the situation Mr Putin today described a “significant blow” to relations with the US will have an effect on the region.

So far, the mantra has been that, politically speaking, what happens outside the Arctic stays outside the Arctic. The more critical would say this is not always the case.

Mr Lavrov, for example, stayed home from the Arctic Council’s biennial meeting in Iqaluit, Canada, in 2015. Officially, the reason was a busy schedule, though pundits reckoned it was more likely due to the on-going row with the West over Moscow’s involvement in eastern Ukraine and its annexation of Crimea. The Canadian hosts had been particularly vocal in their criticism.

SEE RELATED: Canada ratcheting up rhetoric towards Russia

Not showing up, some feared, would be a sign that Moscow was turning its back on co-operation in the region. During the meeting, Mr Lavrov’s absence was indeed noted by the foreign ministers representing the other Arctic states, as well as the leaders of indigenous groups, though they mostly underscored the value they put on his long-standing contributions to Arctic relations, and expressed regret that he did not come.

With the next biennial meeting scheduled to be held in Fairbanks on May 11, the risk is that another out of area issue will have his colleagues again praising him in his absence.