Wednesday May 24, 2017

Register today



Military-political complex

Nato legislators are in Svalbard to see Arctic change close up. While there, Moscow is giving them an earful
Them’s not fightin’ words (Photo: Nato PA)

Share this article

Facebook Google Twitter Mail

iAbout Press releases

As part of our continuing efforts to bring you as much information about our region as possible we offer readers a press release service that allows private firms, public agencies, non-governmental organisations and other groups to submit relevant press releases on our website.

All press releases in this section are published in their full length and have not been edited.

If you have a press release or other announcement you would like to have published, please send it to

We reserve the right to reject press releases we deem irrelevant or inappropriate. 

All material submitted to The Arctic Journal, including pictures and videos, will be assumed to be available for publication by The Arctic Journal and its related entities.

Most of the meetings of the Nato Parliamentary Assembly, a group of lawmakers that is loosely affiliated with the military alliance, go unnoticed. Not so this time around.

The group, which is made up mostly of legislators from Nato countries, has invoked the ire of Moscow for meeting in Svalbard to hold a seminar focusing on developments in the Arctic.

In keeping with the relative anonymity of the group, two previous meetings (in 2004 and 2012) held in the territory, which is controlled by Norway, were not protested by Russia or any of the other non-Nato signatories to the 1920 Svalbard Treaty banning all military activity there.

SEE RELATED: When Dmitry Rogozin speaks, people worry

The third time is no charm. In a statement issued on April 19, Moscow (which refers to the territory as Spitsbergen), accused the meeting of being a continuation of Nato’s “current policy of ‘containing’ Russia”, likening the lawmakers’ gathering to a military exercise, and seeking to bring the territory under Nato control.

The Nato PA argues that the civilian nature of the group and lack of official links to Nato itself should reassure critics of its peaceful intentions. So too should the point of its gathering: like any good meeting about the Arctic, the seminar will focus on the “unprecedented challenges, but also opportunities” global warming presents for commerce and international co-operation in the region.

The changing Arctic does pose a security concern for the alliance, according to Vidar Helgesen, the Norwegian climate minister and host of the seminar, but this has less to do with Russia than it does with the potential for climate change to destabilise countries on Nato’s southern and south-eastern flanks.

“Climate change is a security risk multiplier globally. It will have direct impacts on Europe,” Mr Helegsen said during the meeting’s opening.

Moscow’s objection is the latest in a series of incidents between Norway and Russia involving Svalbard, including, in 2015, threatening tweets by Dmitry Rogozin, Russia’s deputy PM, and, last year, a decision to have Chechen commandos transit the territory in connection with a military exercise at the North Pole.